Our Blog

Your landlord must use a TDP system, even if your deposit is paid by someone else, such as a rent deposit system or your parents. Housing Act 2004The Act introduced protection against rent deposit for short-term insured tenants, penalties for non-compliance, and restricted the use of Section 21 notices for owners operating unlicensed HMOs. In May 2021, the Attorney General`s Office (OAG) opened an investigation into violations of the new bail law after New Yorkers complained that their bails had been withheld by landlords. The investigation revealed that SGW had not sent detailed lists setting out the reasons for the withholding of deposits and therefore did not have the right to retain the deposit. In addition, SGW has not properly separated deposits in escrow accounts as required by law. It is estimated that SGW illegally withheld deposits from 129 residents totalling $296,272.59. Northwood Solihull Ltd v. Fearn & Ors (2020) EWHC 3538 (QB) There were two interrelated issues in this appeal. If the landlord is a business, (i) a notice in accordance with section 8 and (ii) the certificate confirming the information filed must be registered.

If you are in dispute with your landlord, your deposit will be protected in the TDP system until the issue is resolved. Your landlord or rental agent must deposit your deposit into the system within 30 days of receiving it. “An appeal decision of the Higher Court on a rent refund order that raised three issues. the processing of payments made by a tenant after the landlord has stopped committing the housing offence in question, but with respect to rent arrears due during the commission of the offence; secondly, the treatment of security deposits; and thirdly, whether the non-payment of rent by the tenant and the existence of significant arrears are elements of conduct that can be duly taken into account when considering the amount to be reimbursed. At some point during the lease, the business landlord claimed to serve a section 21 notice on the tenant on the basis that the landlord had not properly provided the required information. Your landlord must refund your deposit within 10 days of your agreement on the amount you will recover. This case was handled by the Head of the Housing Protection Unit, Brent Meltzer, with the support of paralegal Cecily Mills of the Housing Protection Unit, former policy analyst John Petro, and Head of Research and Analysis Jonathan Werberg and Chris Nelson. The Housing Protection Unit is headed by Unit Chief Brent Meltzer. The Housing Protection Unit is part of the Social Justice Division, which is headed by Deputy Attorney General Meghan Faux and overseen by Senior Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy. Nicola Banks has its own rental agency in Scotland and has also protected deposits with the DPS: what invalidates a review under Article 21 provides insight into situations in which a review is invalid, including a breach of deposit guarantee rules, failure to provide an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) or breach of licensing obligations. “A quick note, because Rea Murray did the heavy lifting for me. We have already seen the problems of “claims for violation of multiple deposits”, albeit under the pretext of whether a claim could be made simultaneously for a certain number of rentals. This was an appeal by the District Court to a District Judge as to what exactly constitutes a prosecutable violation and how many could be claimed per tenancy.

The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 set out the rules for when a deposit should be protected. We have summarized them below; Davies v Scott, 24 October 2019, Mayor & City County Court. HHJ Saggerson (Unreported, we saw a note of the verdict) This was an appeal from the District Court for failure to protect the bail application. We have seen here the decision of the first instance in this case. That was the case. There is now a high court case (if binding) of Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn & Ors (2020) EWHC 3538 (QB) (thanks to NearlyLegal for the publication of details) which confirmed that mandatory information in the file signed by a company must follow the procedures provided for in the Companies Act (two directors, administrator and corporate secretary or administrator and witness). If the landlord protects the deposit, the information required by the deposit must be signed by the landlord. If the owner is a limited liability company and protects the deposit, the signature must comply with section 44 of the Companies Act 2006. If the deposit is protected by the rental agent, the prescribed information can be signed by the landlord or broker. While this is not the issue at issue in northwood, officers would be well advised to sign all the information required under the Companies Act as a precautionary measure.

On the Nearlylegal blog, an interesting case was published about the mandatory information requirements for rental deposits. “It is really positive for our rental industry that the Scottish Government has introduced legislation on the protection of rent deposits in line with the rest of the UK.” Justice Barber of the Insolvency and Companies Tribunal (ICC) ruled that Lundy Granit`s principle does not extend to the obligation to “replenish” a rent deposit fund where amounts have been withdrawn from the fund to pay the rent. Re London Bridge Entertainment Partners shows how seemingly insignificant business decisions made when a company is solvent are facilitated when the same company becomes insolvent. In this case, the caisse de dépôt`s decision to “pay first, ask questions later” resulted in the landlord effectively losing his order of priority over these rent payments; a priority to which she might otherwise have been entitled. The case also shows that the scope of verifiable debt continues to be interpreted broadly, while the category of administrative costs is interpreted restrictively. Written by Samuel Parsons, lawyer at Guildhall Chambers. “This was an investigative hearing in the context of a real estate lawsuit allegedly brought by Ojo & Opaleye. The tenant, Ms M., defended herself for non-compliance with the regulations on deposit insurance. “Thanks to attorney general James` vigorous efforts, all Brooklyn residents, many of whom are my constituents, are now protected from landlords who have ignored simple and explicit bail laws, many of whom I have sponsored and supported over the years,” said Rep.

Helene Weinstein. “It`s unethical for property managers not to return deposits after tenants have left their homes,” said New York City Council member Farah N. Louis. “When tenants move their families, deposits often serve as additional means to support the transition process, and without them, many families face financial burdens. Moving is expensive and non-compliance with real estate laws is unacceptable. Attorney General James` recent actions have put tenants first by enforcing the law. As the state continues to take cognizance of other investigations, I can only hope that we will see favourable results for those who rely most on bail. I can only hope that landlords and landlords respect the law and their former tenants! Howard v Dalton, County Court at Dartford, May 7, 2019 (unreported, judgment note with grateful thanks to Rea Murray of 4-5 Grays Inn Square).

A quick note, because Rea Murray did the heavy lifting for me. We have seen the “multiple deposit claims.” Your landlord must pay your deposit into a government-approved rent deposit system (TDP) if you rent your home under a guaranteed short-term rent that began after April 6, 2007. In England and Wales, your deposit can be registered with: “Investors who lost money in a failed property development in Liverpool should sue their former lawyers and not the law firm that owned and paid their deposits,” the High Court ruled. So, will the required deposit information included as part of the guild`s AST tenant builder be changed for corporate owners? “There will have been a lot of huts that were empty during the Easter season. Many of them will have been booked and the person who booked paid a deposit. What is the situation? Are they obliged to pay the balance? Can they get the deposit back? A superficial search for such guides, such as those available online, suggests that the doctrine of frustration may have been overlooked. “Ms T was Ms N`s assured short-term tenant. with a fixed-term lease that began on July 25, 2013.