In short, it is the right to deny access to facilities or an event that their organizers or administrators have if there is an irregularity or a forced condition that supports such a decision, and that it is done without violating the fundamental human rights of the individual. In the event that a client sees his rights violated, he can request a complaint form from the employer. In any case, the Autonomous Communities are responsible for the right to take charge. Depending on the municipality in which© the hotel is located, some or other rules may prevail. As in everything, there©are limits to the right of admission, as the owner of the premises cannot use it at will. It could not be considered a right to limit entry to people in these cases: well, I have a friend who likes to play roulette, found out that hard play earned him a lot of money, and lately he has earned a lot in luckia salons, so from one day to the next they could not a happiness to enter, If I try to win another one, they put him on a list so he can`t play in Luckia rooms anymore, they`re based on throwing him away, making him making too much money and sharing the stats, but he`s not cheating actually we tell him to put the Lao, If you want and everything. And today they also threw us out of another place that wasn`t Luckia. I do not see that fairly. In Luccia, they were based on the fact that they have the right of admission, that they paid 18,000 euros to have this right or something like that, and that they can leave out whoever they want, it could be done ???? Call the police? Best wishes! We have all seen the typical sign in bars, restaurants and other public places telling us that the establishment has reserved the right of entry. Now, what does this right mean? Can the owner require the type of customer who comes to his premises? Do you talk more about the type of shoes or clothing you should wear? Can the customer know the requirements of this particular installation? Are there any limits that the admission fee must not exceed? Good. I have a question.
I worked for 2 years ± 1 month for a supermarket company. My dismissal happened because I complained in human memory about the workplace harassment I receive. Now I work for another for a company related to the market where I worked, when it comes to tasting the products obtained from the company I work for, the supermarket manager does not allow me to access them. He says I can`t get into the supermarket because I was working there. If I work in the supermarket, but my dismissal was legal, I did not commit a crime in that supermarket. He has every right to deny me access??? – the administration does not endorse discriminatory criteria or those which pursue aims other than those which constitute the right of authorisation. They could put up a sign on the premises to prevent the foreigner or others from sitting on the basis of the right of reception – or they would violate a fundamental right granted to foreigners – or simply resort to the police ¿ Hi, I wanted to know if the right of access applies in shopping malls and in which law and article if so. Thank you But the owner is not the only one with rights and obligations. The consumer also©has his own duties: hello. ±A year and a half ago, I had a verbal argument with a campsite employee who had been ± for years. This employee attacked me with his words, to which I replied and said the address.
We apologize for this confrontation and I do not bother to throw myself out, but at this moment the management threatens to kick me out if they want to, without having made a mistake. They don`t let me reveal my discomfort about the service, that is, they silence me or throw me out. Is it legal? Consequences of abuse of rights for the owner of the premises If, on the other hand, you call the police because they threw you out without justification, you can claim that your right as a consumer has been violated. As you may have read in the article, the right of admission must be based on a general or specific condition. In general, access to the facility may be prohibited to persons who have access with alcohol or excessive drugs, carry weapons, become violent if they are minors, if the capacity is completed, have not paid the corresponding entrance or if it is time to close the facility. At no point is the possibility created that a dirty person could be refused entry. 4.- Request the presence of the police for serious discrimination of the right of access (the police authority will inform the owner of the sanction to which it is subject). Apart from the list of conditions of the right of access, access may only be refused if the capacity of the facility, the closing time, if the minimum age of access to the premises is not reached or accredited, or due to a fault of the citizen (carrying weapons without members of the security forces and organs, having an aggressive or provocative attitude, wearing racist, xenophobic or fascist clothing or emblems, provoking arguments, not having good personal hygiene, using tobacco or other illegal drugs or acting under their influence, etc.) An auxiliary doorman or nightclub without a security title. They cannot prevent you from accessing a website for discriminatory, accidental or unfounded reasons. If his conduct is correct and, in principle, if he does not commit a crime of defamation or defamation, and I say in principle that, because we have to analyse the specific conditions of the football club`s right of admission, they should not be able to prohibit it from entering the field. When we talk about the right of admission and permanence, we are referring to the decision envisaged by public and/or private entities to admit or refuse access and residence of one or more persons on their premises, provided that this does not affect their fundamental fundamental rights and is protected by objective conditions of entry and residence.
You cannot ban access to a facility for racist or discriminatory reasons, so the facts you tell are not in accordance with the law. However, it is always preferable to report these facts at the time of their occurrence. So if this happens again, you should call the police and ask for the report form you need to provide. In La Rioja, Article 20 of Law 4/2000 of 25 October (BOR 18 Nov.) regulates the right of authorization, qualifying its arbitrary, discriminatory or abusive use as serious misconduct on the part of the employer (Article 42.8), which entails an economic penalty of € 601,018 to € 30,050,605, suspension or prohibition of activity (or closure of premises) for a period not exceeding 6 months, or both penalties together (Article 45(2)). Hi, I wanted to ask you what they did to me. Some colleagues and I left the takeaway store where we worked because of our boss who treated us quite badly, a colleague had an anxiety attack because of her, and 3 of us went to work in a store where we sell similar drinks, in addition to other things, My former boss when he found out he had banned us, To enter the premises just because of his anger, and he didn`t even tell us, a colleague told us who we talked to, because we always get along with those who were there, we didn`t do anything, neither verbally nor physically, my question is, can you really? Is it legal? Can former employees be denied access? Because as far as I can remember, we didn`t have the right of entry anywhere in the premises.